In addition to legal innovations, the Soviets generated a massive amount of documentary evidence of Nazi war crimes through their Extraordinary State Commission. Soviet Judgment at Nuremberg offers the first complete picture of the International Military Tribunal (IMT), including the many ironies brought to bear as the Soviets took their place among the countries of the prosecution in late 1945.

“[It] rightfully re-orients the Soviet legal system and its leading minds into the center of the creation of post-World War II international law.” –  We deserve better than this. American. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our It looks like you are located in Australia or New Zealand It would be much more honest to stop calling Soviet justice “justice” and name it for what it is, “revangism”, instead. Now, that definitely sounds like “Soviet-style” to me. The Soviets would later marry the coercive, authoritarian law of the Imperial era with their media prowess to enforce and legitimate a “revolutionary legality.” Soviet judges and prosecutors during the collectivization-industrialization campaigns of the 1930s determined guilt or innocence based on a nebulous “revolutionary conscience,” an ethos promoted by courtroom theatricality and spread by the Soviet press. Persistence and creativity paid off. Friday, 14 Aug 2020 22:32 PM

Indeed, this is an oversight of many Western scholars, George Ginsburg and Francine Hirsch excluded.Soviet influence was also apparent at several important events during and after the war. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our It looks like you are located in Australia or New Zealand Oprah bought 26 billboards in Louisville, Kentucky to demand justice for Breonna Taylor after featuring her image on the cover of the September issue of her magazine. During the trials, Trainin published his observations of German soldiers denying personal guilt based on their duty to obey superiors. In his chapter on the imperial era’s influence on Soviet-style justice, Crowe notes that these late imperial trials of revolutionaries showcased “the power of authority in a courtroom over the rule law” (33). Keep discussions on topic, avoid personal attacks and threats of any kind. "They didn't want to work in a bipartisan way. From the 'show' trials of the 1920s and 1930s to the London Conference, this book examines the Soviet role in the Nuremberg IMT trial through the prism of the ideas and practices of earlier Soviet legal history, detailing the evolution of … are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. “[It] rightfully re-orients the Soviet legal system and its leading minds into the center of the creation of post-World War II international law.” –  Western historiography is rich in the topic of the “just following orders” defense at Nuremberg; therefore, rebalancing the story to include Soviet legal history and influence is warranted, as this volume does so well with other themes.Lastly, several chapters reassess the Soviet’s performance at the International Military Tribunal (IMT). Soon after Alexander II introduced the principle of trial-by-jury, agitators discovered the power of these open trials to sway juries and public opinion to their causes. Stalin’s Soviet Justice rightfully re-orients the Soviet legal system and its leading minds into the center of the creation of post-World War II international law.